Re: IFS vs.live axle

From: Cale Henry Bargen (vencomatic@ameritech.net)
Date: Thu Dec 09 1999 - 14:10:57 EST


All right - I'm jumping into this one head-first. If IFS is the best,
why do the desert racers continue to run live axles on their 36" travel
rear suspensions? I'm a personal advocate of IFS all the way around,
but this clinging to live axles on these off-roaders perplexes me.
Anyone - please throw in their $0.02!

Cale
98cc318sporty, no longer scarred

NVMYDakota@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/9/99 11:24:00 AM Mountain Standard Time,
> ZeNel1eac1@aol.com writes:
>
> > > These trucks can take a hill straight on at a 72%
> > > grade, and are basically the 4 wheeler from hell. You want to talk
> about
> >
> > the
> > >
> > > better suspensions ... my vote is on the IFS.
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > > USAF
> >
> > Yeah as long as the hill is 8 feet wide....
> >
> > >>Hummers.. HMVVs whatever you wanna call em



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:50 EST