TB's & other questions

From: Mtbfed@aol.com
Date: Sun Dec 12 1999 - 01:17:24 EST


Well lets start with the noise (music to us!) from the air intake system
this would not be acceptable to non-gearhead types, so they put on an
air intake that quiets the sound, which also flows so poorly that a bigger
TB wouldn't do anything anyway. Now the exhaust, ditto on the noise
thing. So if you enjoy the sound of an unrestricted DAK, than you can
enjoy better performance, and gas milage!
(this is all speculation)

Marc Federici
99 SLT+ CC 5.2 5sp 4x2 3.55sg

<In response to an earlier post regarding increasing mpg it seemed to be
<generally accepted that a better TB, air intake system and exhaust system
<would go a long way. These same mods seem to be the place to start on
<performance upgrades also. A few questions, please, to a willing learner:
<
<1. What, if any, is the downside to these mods?
<2. If the downside is neglible, why doesn't DC put these in to begin
<with?
<3. Increased mpg would be good for their CAFE ratings, right?
<4. Increased performance would be good for their ads and sales, right?
<5. Cost to put these in on the assembly line would be minimal, right?
<
<So, what's the down side to these mods?
<Thanks, Cal Hyer



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:52 EST