I built my intake for about $70 using a 3" 90 degree elbow of aluminized
steel tubing. This includes a 9" conical K&N I got from Quick D. See at
http://users.jnlk.com/dakrt/homemade.htm
Gilbert Vega '98 BL CC R/T
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Friday, December 17, 1999 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: QuickD Intake
>Home Depot - 3" PVC Pipe (about 12" long) with a 45 degree piece to the
>stock Air Hat and a 6"x9" K&N Cone Filter. They don't look as pretty as
the
>QuickD, but they are functional. (Personally, I've built a "Home Brew"
>which costed about $70 for the anodized blue intake tube. You can build
>them for about $50 including the filter.)
>
>- Bernd
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jason&Sarah" <Jpm699@email.msn.com>
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 12:22 AM
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: QuickD Intake
>
>
>> Please explain the homebrew intake tubes.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >After a few tests on a Ram 1500 (14"x3" K&N), a '98 5.2L Dak (14"x2.5")
>and
>> >my own 3.9L (10"x2.5"), we found that the QuickD, K&N Gen-II, and
>homebrew
>> >Intake Tubes make slightly more power and get better MPG.
>> >
>> >- Bernd
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Jason&Sarah" <Jpm699@email.msn.com>
>> >To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> >Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 6:49 PM
>> >Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: QuickD Intake
>> >
>> >
>> >> Why?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >YES.
>> >> >
>> >> >- Bernd
>> >> >
>> >> >----- Original Message -----
>> >> >From: <Mst29@aol.com>
>> >> >To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> >> >Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 8:44 AM
>> >> >Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: QuickD Intake
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> I have the 14"x2.25" K+N. Would i be better off with the GEN2?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:57 EST