RE: 00 Dakota Question [Seat Related]

From: Sam Parthemer (srp@home.com)
Date: Thu Dec 23 1999 - 03:44:28 EST


Have the 40/20/40 in my wife's 4x4 CC.. Love it. Same seats,
bigger arm rest. Plus, you can put 3 (cozy) people up front if
needed. If the truck is a RC, I'd go with the standard console.

Sam '00 RT RC (buckets), '99 CC Sport 4x4 (40/20/40)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of William Harrison
> Hiatt III
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 12:19 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: 00 Dakota Question [Seat Related]
>
>
> Welp. I'm about to buy a 2000 Dodge Dakota. It has the following
> options:
> Black Clear Coat, Heavey Duty Service Group, 40/20/40 Split Bench, Sport
> Plus, Deluxe Convenience Group, Power Overhead Convience Group, 4 wheel
> ABS, Front Floor Mats, 4 speed auto, 4.7L v8, Anti-Spn Differential, way
> power drivers seat, power 6x9 mirrors, rear sliding window,
> am/fm/cass/cd, steering wheel audio controls, and leather wrap steering
> wheel. Now... From what the dealer said, and from what I saw, the
> 40/20/40 bench seating is the SAME thing as the bucket seats, except the
> armrest/console can be put up and become a third seat for the front,
> which I would never use. But actually, the console in the bucket seats
> would be filled with all my crap/trash, so I don't know, it could be a
> good thing. What's your guy's opinions. How is the bench seat -vs- the
> buckets? Is there a physical differnce in the actual driver and
> passenger seats? Thanks for all your help
>
> William H. Hiatt III
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:02 EST