Re: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight

From: SuperNagz@aol.com
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 17:26:08 EST

Next message: GS-: "Re: Re: 2K Chevy encounter.....D@#N"
Previous message: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9?"
Maybe in reply to: Palmer, Lane: "RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Next in thread: Sonia St.laurent: "Re: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Reply: Sonia St.laurent: "Re: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I find it very hard to believe that your race weight was only 3700 lbs.

I have the lightest Dakota R/T possible, and the truck weighs in at 4,000 lbs
exactly, with 155 lb me in it.

I really doubt that the 4.7L is 300 lbs lighter than the 360.

Next message: GS-: "Re: Re: 2K Chevy encounter.....D@#N"
Previous message: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9?"
Maybe in reply to: Palmer, Lane: "RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Next in thread: Sonia St.laurent: "Re: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Reply: Sonia St.laurent: "Re: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:35 EDT