235HP for the 4.7 and 250 for the 5.9. THe K/N will add the additional lost
torque and HP. Adding the new module chip from Superchip will returned the
motor to run additional 20HP (depending on the additonal modification) and
use premium fuel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barret, Matt" <MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 7:51 AM
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT out......die thread die - Weight
> Hey, thats great Lane!, Thanks for doing that, i really appreciate it.
When
> I get back from the Dyno, I'll post the numbers and we can compare!! So,
220
> RWH, not counting the additional Drivetrain losses!!!! Also, the ET you
> used was my personal best so far, and I had a Home K&N filter intake
system
> on there, So, we have to take that into consideration, as this was NOT A
> STOCK TRUCK, DID EVERYONE HEAR ME?!!! IT WAS NOT A STOCK TRUCK!!!!!
>
> 10% added you say gives us 242 hp, and its rated stock at 235/230??. So
> maybe the K&N setup I did is worth the additional 7/12 hp????!! Just a
> guess!
> Thanks again Lane!
>
> __________________________________
> Matt -- Mechanicsville, VA
> `00 Sport Plus 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD RC 2x4
> Homemade K&N open element, Traction Bars,
> Spring clamps, ... BEST 1/4 14.871 @ 91.01 MPH
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Palmer, Lane [mailto:LPalmer@wwusa.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 10:21 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight
>
>
> <Ok.. I put these numbers in to the Corral's engine dyno and this is what
it
> <came up with. 220 rwh. add 10% for drive train loss and you get 242 at
the
> <crank. I believe the 4.7 is rated at 235 so this is pretty close. I've
put
> <the numbers in from my stang and it was almost dead on and I have the
real
> <dyno sheet so I know what it really makes.
>
>
> <The Corral: Engine Dyno
> <Initial Readings
> <READING OUTPUT UNITS
> <WEIGHT 3700 pounds
> <TRAP SPEED 91 mph
> <E/T 14.87 seconds
> <Dyno Readings
> READING OUTPUT UNITS
> Total Horsepower 222 bhp
> Horsepower Used 222 bhp
> Best E/T 14.87 seconds
> Fuel Readings
> READING OUTPUT UNITS
> Specific Fuel Consumption 111.21 pounds/hour
> Fuel Pump Capacity 66.73 liters/hour
> Optimal Fuel Pump Capacity 80.07 liters/hour
> Injector Flow Rate 15.99 lb/hr Injectors
>
>
> Lane Palmer
> Howell, NJ
> 85 Mustang LX Coupe, Vortech Supercharged 302. 11.98 @ 120
> 73 Mustang Grande 351C. 12.69 @ 107
> 00 Dodge Dakota SLT 4X4. 4.7L Auto 3.92 LSD
> http://nj5.injersey.com/~fastlane/lane.htm
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barret, Matt [mailto:MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 7:19 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight
>
>
> Thanks Ryan, I guess that is right, I have seen a few responses that are
> saying the same thing about 3800-3900 for the RT RC, so Maybe like 100
> pounds less for me, OK, maybe 3700. I just need to find a weigh station
> somewhere. Maybe when I go to the shop to have the dyno test done they can
> weigh the thing? They're bound to have scales!
> __________________________________
> Matt -- Mechanicsville, VA
> `00 Sport Plus 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD RC 2x4
> Homemade K&N open element, Traction Bars,
> Spring clamps, ... BEST 1/4 14.871 @ 91.01 MPH
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Krokosinski [mailto:ryan@equinoxfinancial.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 6:14 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9 - Weight
>
>
> In case it matters...
> My '99 R/T RC with all options except A/C and 4 wheel Anti-lock weighs in
at
> 3916 lbs.
> This weight is truck only with spare intact and a FULL tank of gas (street
> trim).
> The 00's probably weigh a little less, but 3300 seems a bit light. I would
> think
> more along the lines of 3700-3800 but maybe I'm wrong. Anyone weighed
their
> '00
> yet?
>
> Ryan K
> '99 R/T RC
>
> "Barret, Matt" wrote:
>
> > Hey, that sounds cool, My truck is a 00 Regular cab sport 2wd, Not sure
> what
> > it weighs??
> > maybe like 3300 pounds, just a guess?? someone help us on this?!! I
weigh
> > 200 pounds.
> > so, use 3500 pounds unless someone has a more accurate weight for my
> truck.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:35 EDT