Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob

From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Date: Sun Jan 16 2000 - 18:11:29 EST


In a message dated 1/16/2000 2:38:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,
fawcett@uism.bu.edu writes:

<< The reason that I chose to go with the 1.6 roller rockers was the
 durability factor over a long period of time while getting
 the engine to high rpms in the shortest time possible (track).
 Can I prove it? NOPE.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
 '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
>>

    thanks Bob you saved me $500+ rockers+ valve covers,,,,,.....
    
    BUT WHAT NOW !!!!!

                        Ted O.
    99 SLT + 4X4, Powerdyne SC'er, Leach headers, Gibson stainless catback,
TransGo shift kit, R&D TB, K&N, Taylor wires, Autolite 3923's, 4.10's front
and rear, Hoosier Drag slicks, Msd Boost retard ignition, Auto meter Boost
gauge, Beer cooler...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:49 EDT