Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Mon Jan 17 2000 - 12:34:07 EST

Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers"
Previous message: ZeNel1eac1@aol.com: "Re: SAD DAY FOR THE VIPER"
In reply to: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Next in thread: fdedip@whale-mail.com: "Re: Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Maybe reply: fdedip@whale-mail.com: "Re: Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:33 AM 1/17/00 EST, you wrote:
> Big consideration here, tread mill sniffer in Md.

Same in Ontario. BTW, those things are capable of doing
a chasis dyno.

Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
'97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.

Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers"
Previous message: ZeNel1eac1@aol.com: "Re: SAD DAY FOR THE VIPER"
In reply to: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Next in thread: fdedip@whale-mail.com: "Re: Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Maybe reply: fdedip@whale-mail.com: "Re: Re: Re: 1.7 v. 1.6 roller rockers --attn: Bob"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:50 EDT