Re: 97-00 Dakota Clear Tail Lamps(Red Bulbs)

From: Clay Cooke (cooke@ecn.purdue.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 14:09:18 EST


Well, Im definatley not on the inside of law enforcement, but I do know
some stuff. It is not totally illegal to alter the tail lights. Look at
the new style clear lenses that are comming out. They have a small section
of red on them and the majority of the lens is clear. These are DOT
approved lights, there for legal.

Also, I have contacted state and local law enforcement in Indiana and both
have told me as long as they produce a RED light then there should be no
problem, and this has been repeated numerous times. Ive had my clear rear
lights and clear marker lights on for a year now with still NO problems,
no tickets, nada......

Clay

84 Dodge Ram, scrappin pavement w/ 440 8bbl
96 Indy Ram, scrappin EVERYTHING w/ 360 Magnum!' -(www.indyram.org)
69 Road Runner 440 6bbl, project car

http://expert.cc.purdue.edu/~cooke

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 CrescentResearch@aol.com wrote:

> Being on the "inside" of law enforcement, I can tell you it is illegal to
> alter the factory taillamps and lenses of any vehicle in any way. Covers and
> "blackouts" are legal, because you are not actually changing the factory
> equipment. Clear taillight lenses are illegal no matter what color the bulbs
> are, or what color a little box inside them is. The point of the lenses
> being red is not only to light up red at night, but to provide "navigational"
> markers for other motorists during the day as well. No, I don't think it
> makes sense either, but sorry, that's the law. If you like I'll quote the
> exact motor vehicle statute for it. You can still get a ticket for clear
> taillight lenses, and it will be legitamate. And if you try to fight it in
> court, it's a waste of your time... you'll lose. Besides, do they really
> look that good anyway??? Personally, I don't think it's worth the money or
> the trouble. -Mike
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:10 EDT