Here is what I have from when I went to the track with some friends driving
each of the cars =-)
89 Mustang GT (5 speed) = 14.9
98 Mustang GT (Auto) = 15.01
99 Trans Am (Auto) = 13.5
96 Trans Am (Auto) = 14.1
97 Dakota cc (Auto) = 15.8 =-) (workin on it)
there are some numbers all of which were stock except a K&N here and
there....
__________________________________________________________
Tim Berry -- Chesapeake, VA
`97 SLT 318 auto CC 2x4 LSD:
Dual Exaust w/Flowmaster, Homemade K&N GEN II, 16" Electric Fan
180 T-stat, Accel 8.5's, Lakewood Traction Bars, F&B Stage 1 TB
ASP Pullies (Crank/Alt), Trans Go Shift Kit, BFG 275/60's, Hypertech PTM
BEST 1/4 15.836 @ 84.93 MPH (exaust, 180 stat, and wires only...)
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Hernandez" <georgeh@tocquigny.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
> True! They recently beefed up the engines to catch up w/ the
camaro/firebird.
> The new GT's can stay with the older LT1 cars, but they are still behind
the
> LS1 car. In other words, I wouldn't race a Mustang w/ the new body style!
> 96-98 cars are the ones I referred to. Besides a few exceptions I think
they
> are just not that quick, even though I prefer that bodystyle over the fox
style
> and newer cars.
>
> Stlaurent Mr Steven wrote:
>
> > 00 GT are rated at 285HP and the V6 Sport is rated at 195HP.
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
> > Test Engineer
> > Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
> > MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
> > mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
> > mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
> > Office: (760) 725-2296
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> George Hernandez
> Tocquigny Advertising + Design
> 512.329.8065 ext.135
> Fax: 512.328.5645
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:53 EDT