On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Bernd D. Ratsch wrote:
> All this talk about which if faster...but it's an unfair challenge if ya ask
> me...
>
> R/T - Normally Aspirated
> Lightning - Supercharged
>
> Now lets either take the S/C off of the Lightning or add on to an R/T. Now
> that's a little bit more fair.
>
> - Bernd
>
> (Nothing against you Jon)
Hey, I think I adequately demonstrated my Dak loyalty at the end of
the post... ;-D The Lightning is definitely faster, but I agree with
ya, I don't think its a fair challenge. Not only from the aspiration
standpoint, but from a price standpoint as well. About the only thing
they have in common is that they're both trucks. :-) I guess its
sort've like comparing the McLaren F1 and a Z28. :-) For a million
bucks, I bet you could make that Chebby haul some serious butt. :-)
-Jon-
.--- jon@dakota-truck.net -- or -- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------.
| Jon Steiger * AOPA, DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA * RP-SEL |
| '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly 447 |
`---------------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:54 EDT