Re: R/T versus 5.0 Stang

From: mike d. (miggitymike@juno.com)
Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 20:07:13 EST

Next message: mike d.: "Re: If we can get White Face guages, why not Clear fron Lenses?"
Previous message: mike d.: "Re: 88 results..."
Maybe in reply to: Matt Keast: "R/T versus 5.0 Stang"
Next in thread: Matt Keast: "Re: R/T versus 5.0 Stang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>Whatcha trying to say here mike,,10's w/ 4.6s ????????<<

yup =)

they were all blown or juiced, but they were in the 10's.. anyone who was
at the Cecil meet can back me on it =)

-mike d.

---> Yorktown, Va.
88 Dakota LE: slammed, painted, and PARKED =(

miggitymike@juno.com
http://members.xoom.com/dakotaperf/index.html

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Next message: mike d.: "Re: If we can get White Face guages, why not Clear fron Lenses?"
Previous message: mike d.: "Re: 88 results..."
Maybe in reply to: Matt Keast: "R/T versus 5.0 Stang"
Next in thread: Matt Keast: "Re: R/T versus 5.0 Stang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:56 EDT