Re: R/T versus 5.0 Stang

From: NVMYDakota@aol.com
Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 23:46:32 EST


In a message dated 2/6/00 9:33:35 PM Mountain Standard Time,
mkeast@golden.net writes:

> Sorry about that......it's acutally a 95' 5.0 Mustang. I had the year
> wrong....I couldn't remember
> if it was '95 or '96 that was the last year of the 5 litre. Anyways, I
> pretty much figured that I would
> have trouble keeping up with a 5.0 Stang...atleast off the line. From what
> I've noticed it seems very fast early on but abit sluggish in higher gears.
> It's fast but I'm not impressed with it otherwise.
> Lots of rattles coming from everywhere (very annoying) just doens't feel
> like it is well put together.
> I will probably give it a try anyway!....

Wow I am very sorry to hear this, I found a Semi Modded Rustang (Exhaust and
Intake) Just like me(well mine a Dakota...) Anyways, I showd this idiot what
Magnum Power meant.... He had a Big Ol 5.0L sticker diagonally across on teh
rear quater panel! damn this was too much fun.... The only car I won't mess
wiht are those 5.0 Cobras, there pretty damned fast,

As for the Fit and Finish of mustangs, the feel like they were made in
Mexico(Mexican quality) and it seemed like somone dumped ina buncha Mexican
Jumpin Beans, ratlles and noises everywhere, I see why every mustang has a
loud stereo!!!!!!!!!!

    Greg

PS even my OLD 1993 Dakota was quiter than taht damned mustang!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:56 EDT