Did they ever put 5.0s in the 98 body style? I have seen a guy with that
badge on the rear where the svt logo would normally be and was wondering?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: NVMYDakota@aol.com <NVMYDakota@aol.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Sunday, February 06, 2000 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>In a message dated 2/6/00 9:33:35 PM Mountain Standard Time,
>mkeast@golden.net writes:
>
>> Sorry about that......it's acutally a 95' 5.0 Mustang. I had the year
>> wrong....I couldn't remember
>> if it was '95 or '96 that was the last year of the 5 litre. Anyways, I
>> pretty much figured that I would
>> have trouble keeping up with a 5.0 Stang...atleast off the line. From
what
>> I've noticed it seems very fast early on but abit sluggish in higher
gears.
>> It's fast but I'm not impressed with it otherwise.
>> Lots of rattles coming from everywhere (very annoying) just doens't feel
>> like it is well put together.
>> I will probably give it a try anyway!....
>
>Wow I am very sorry to hear this, I found a Semi Modded Rustang (Exhaust
and
>Intake) Just like me(well mine a Dakota...) Anyways, I showd this idiot
what
>Magnum Power meant.... He had a Big Ol 5.0L sticker diagonally across on
teh
>rear quater panel! damn this was too much fun.... The only car I won't
mess
>wiht are those 5.0 Cobras, there pretty damned fast,
>
>As for the Fit and Finish of mustangs, the feel like they were made in
>Mexico(Mexican quality) and it seemed like somone dumped ina buncha
Mexican
>Jumpin Beans, ratlles and noises everywhere, I see why every mustang has a
>loud stereo!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Greg
>
>PS even my OLD 1993 Dakota was quiter than taht damned mustang!
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:56 EDT