RE: Re: 5.2 vs4.7

From: Barret, Matt (MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com)
Date: Sun Feb 13 2000 - 10:25:48 EST


Hell Yea!!
___________________________
Matt -- Mechanicsville, VA
`00 Sport Plus 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD RC 2x4
Homemade K&N open element, Traction Bars,
Spring clamps, ... BEST 1/4 14.871 @ 91.01 MPH
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim J Koth [mailto:Tim.J.Koth@aexp.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 7:23 PM
To: dakota-truck%buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: 5.2 vs4.7

I've owned 3 318's over the years. Loved them baby's. There's always room in

my garage for a 318.
In my 2000 Dak I got the 4.7 and I love it too. It doesn't have the low end
grunt of the ol' 318. But it makes
up for it other areas of driveability. It's just one flat-out fun runnin
engine. Once you get to 3000 rpms that
baby just pulls, and there ain't enough O's in smooth to describe it as far
as
I'm concerned!! I think Ma
Mopar did a pretty damn good job with the 4.7 myself....

--- previous messages -------

Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:26:32 -0600
From: "Aaron" <acolona@i-55.com>
Subject: DML: Re: 5.2 vs4.7

o.h.c. = overly hyped crap

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <Scubagatr@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 7:52 AM
Subject: DML: 5.2 vs4.7

> Does anybody have an opinion. Is there anybody that has a 4.7 that
wishes
> they had a 5.2?
>
> Long live the 318
>
>
> Dave Naples, FL(97 cc 5.2 2wd SLT) STOCK and loving it
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:04 EDT