No you little smartass, if the G-Tech had been in the
5.9 in front of him it would have registered about a
17.0 second 1/4 since PUSHING that slow 360 would have
slown him down. He wasn't being a smartass in his
post, why do you feel you have to be? Be constructive
and helpful or just don't post.
--- Scott Morris <smorris@i-55.com> wrote:
> Ok then, you have the FASTEST auto 4.7 in the
> universe. Then you should be
> spanking ss's. Let me think about this
>
>
> NO
> Maybe 15.4 but not 13.4, remember you have an
> automatic(-70 horsies to the
> rear wheels)When you come back to our planet, since
> you must have went to
> the moon raceway, you'll realize that it won't
> happen.
>
> scott
> feel free to email.
>
> (maybe your g-tech was in the 5.9 in front of you.)
>
> grasp reallity and realize that
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <WillTier@aol.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 8:16 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: 5.2 vs4.7
>
>
> > In a message dated 2/14/00 2:44:46 PM Eastern
> Standard Time,
> > bruckman@urisp.com writes:
> >
> > > 1/4 mile 13.4 seconds @ 94.6 mph
> > >
> > > i have an Auto RC 4.7L 4x2 totally stock.
> > >
> > > the only other factor in these tests is my 225
> lb. friend was in the
> > > passenger seat.
> > >
> >
> > BAWAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
> > I can't stand it BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
> >
>
>
=====
Donny M Hayes
donny_m_hayes@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:07 EDT