24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 09:54:03 EST

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: tonneau's"
Previous message: Alan Short: "Re: Waterbox Question"
In reply to: Sam Parthemer: "RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Next in thread: Sam Parthemer: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Reply: Sam Parthemer: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Maybe reply: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:40 AM 3/3/00 -0800, you wrote:
> <snip> '98-99 RT's had 19# fuel inj, whereas the '00 has 24# fuel inj
... The truck OEM stock ran better than my '99 did.
>Sam '00 RT

Sam

How are the 24# injectors running on '00? Any driveability problems
anywhere on the rpm scale? Too rich? Is this with the OEM computer?
Thanks.

Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
'97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: tonneau's"
Previous message: Alan Short: "Re: Waterbox Question"
In reply to: Sam Parthemer: "RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Next in thread: Sam Parthemer: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Reply: Sam Parthemer: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Maybe reply: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:30 EDT