RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 10:49:26 EST


I WOULD OPT FOR 32LB FOR SC. ENOUGH AIR/FULE FLOW TO USE THE DIFFERENCES.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
Office: (760) 725-2296

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Parthemer [mailto:srp@home.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 7:16 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: 24# injectors WAS: Re: DML: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T package

Well.. that's the way the truck came from the factory. I would imagine
that the computer is setup for it OEM, and so are the emissions
stuff. I've known people to run 24# on 5.2Ls and '97-99 5.9Ls
that noticed worse gas mileage, and noticable lag off the line...
Also 24# inj. are recommended if you are going to a SC...

Not sure the other benefits, but I am planning on running NX, and
the extra fuel potential is needed for me.

Sam '00 RT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bob Tom
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 9:54 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: 24# injectors WAS: Re: DML: RE: R/T with Magnum R/T
> package
>
>
> At 06:40 AM 3/3/00 -0800, you wrote:
> > <snip> '98-99 RT's had 19# fuel inj, whereas the '00 has 24# fuel inj
> ... The truck OEM stock ran better than my '99 did.
> >Sam '00 RT
>
> Sam
>
> How are the 24# injectors running on '00? Any driveability problems
> anywhere on the rpm scale? Too rich? Is this with the OEM computer?
> Thanks.
>
> Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
> '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:30 EDT