I just put on a FloMaster 3 chamber, but I only replaced the muffler. The
stock exhaust is either 2" or 2.25" to the cat and 2.5" from there back, so
I couldn't really justify the whole cat back. I haven't noticed any
difference in performance but it sure sounds better. I'm preparing to order
a QuickD TB & intake very soon.
Cal
99 CC, V-6, auto
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Pryer <mark_pryer@hotmail.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Next mod....V6ers
> I also recently put a dynomax muffler on and had the shop bend me a custom
> exhaust and I can noticeably feel a difference. Just don't go too big.
> Mark
> 91 cc 5spd 6er Dynomax catback 14x3 K&N
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gregg Omo <dak_fan92@yahoo.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Next mod....V6ers
>
>
> > > Although the catback sounds cool (i wanted to go
> > > with a Flowmaster
> > > 3-chamber - dual out to the rear set-up), I havn't
> > > heard many V6ers say that
> > > it improved anything performance wise??? Although it
> > > looks sweet.
> > >
> >
> > I recently put a cat back on my my Dakota. I went
> > with a Dynomax turbo tube...I know, not a
> > flowmaster...but anyway. I did lose some low end, but
> > gained a good deep sound and nice looking duals. Not
> > sure if anybody knows, but the stock dual pipes for
> > fullsize Chevy's (not sure what year) fit on a Dakota
> > perfectly...you just have to cut the extra length off.
> >
> > Anyway, not much of a performance gain...maybe with
> > some more mods like an intake or something....but nice
> > looking.
> >
> > Gregg
> > 92 V6 CC
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://im.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:42 EDT