Yea, a few months back I posted my speed limiter cut in at 116 mph!!!
__________________________________
Matt -- Mechanicsville, VA Y2K-HEMI
`00 Sport Plus 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD
RC 2x4 Homemade intake & K&N open element,
Traction Bars, Spring clamps
BEST 1/4 14.80 @ 90.97 MPH
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim J Koth [mailto:Tim.J.Koth@aexp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 4:49 PM
To: dakota-truck%buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Was: New to List/Dakota rec. Now: Speed limiter
I had my Dak up to about 102 recently with no sign of the speed limiter. ( I
thought I was going maybe 85 till I looked down and about crapped..) Anyway,
there was a thread about 2 months ago about that and it was obvious tha the
speed limiter is not consistently applied across vehicles. I'd bet the same
is
true of the Toyotas. Some probably cut out before others. For me, I started
worrying about those Goodyear Wranglers, they aren't speed rated at all and
the thought of one coming apart at 102 mph gives me acute sphincter
pucker.......
-------- previous post ----------
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:30:42 -0800
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
Subject: DML: RE: Re: New to List/Dakota rec.
I agree with exception to the speed limiter that stopped me after 97MPH
beating up the Tacoma V-6. I laughed because it took him sometime to catch
up then pass me.
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:43:04 -0800
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: HP RATINGS NEED
Let us try that again the CC 4.7 is much lighter than the R/T 5.9 CC. The
numbers are upside down.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:51 EDT