Re: CC vs. QC

From: durling@attglobal.net
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 22:18:43 EST


If they made one i'd buy it in a heartbeat. Wouldn't get rid of my current dak but
would love a smaller truck with a diesel. Just got a new company vehicle
yesterday...dodge ram QC dually with the cummins. I don't know why I was given this
truck caus eit's a giant bastard to drive. Thank god it wasn't a 4x4 then it would
really drive me crazy. The topper was I have to drive it to and from work. Sucks to
work for your parents. Almost 30 and still can't get away from my father and theis
damn giant truck. Don't get me wrong it's nice and loaded but tooooooooo big for my
tastes.

Jeff Durling
'96 RC Sport-318 "wishin for a diesel in a dak"

Andy Levy wrote:

> So how long till we see you putting a deisel engine in the Dakota?
>
> fawcett@uism.bu.edu wrote:
> >
> > Call me old fashioned in thinking bigger is better. ;-) I really need to test
> > drive one of these 4.7L and learn a little more about 'em... If I opted for it
> > I don't think fuel efficiency would the significant reason as it doesn't seem
> > extraordinarily better than the other V8's from what I've read. My biggest
> > reason for wanting the 5.9L is 'cause, as you know, I'm a torque freak... I
> > like my torque curve high, long and flat! :-)
> > Tom
> > ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> > Subject: Re: DML: CC vs. QC
> > Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Date: 3/21/00 6:04 AM
> >
> > Really Tom? With gas prices the way they are now? That's kinda surprising
> > to me, cause i'd still take the 4.7 in quad cab form if i was buying my Dak
> > right now.
> >
> > Frank WJ
> >
> > >
> > >Had it been available I would have gone with the QC and the 5.9L.
> > >Tom
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> -andy
>
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Let's all get GNU'd together!
> -----------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:55 EDT