So how long till we see you putting a deisel engine in the Dakota?
fawcett@uism.bu.edu wrote:
>
> Call me old fashioned in thinking bigger is better. ;-) I really need to test
> drive one of these 4.7L and learn a little more about 'em... If I opted for it
> I don't think fuel efficiency would the significant reason as it doesn't seem
> extraordinarily better than the other V8's from what I've read. My biggest
> reason for wanting the 5.9L is 'cause, as you know, I'm a torque freak... I
> like my torque curve high, long and flat! :-)
> Tom
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject: Re: DML: CC vs. QC
> Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: 3/21/00 6:04 AM
>
> Really Tom? With gas prices the way they are now? That's kinda surprising
> to me, cause i'd still take the 4.7 in quad cab form if i was buying my Dak
> right now.
>
> Frank WJ
>
> >
> >Had it been available I would have gone with the QC and the 5.9L.
> >Tom
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-- -andyhttp://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com ----------------------------------------------------------- Let's all get GNU'd together! -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:54 EDT