RE: DML How does Mopar cat back & headers compare to others

From: John Mautz (jmautz@home.com)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 22:24:03 EST


For Headers I went with Mesa Headers (www.mesaheaders.com). Excellent
quality and performance. 17 RW Dyno proved HP. They aren't that far out of
line either if you consider that they come with the y-pipe.

John Mautz
'99 Durango SLT+, 5.9L, 4x4, 3.55 LSD, QuickD Air Intake, QuickD 51.75 mm
TB, Mesa Headers, Mesa 3" cat and 3" cat-back (Magnaflow), Dual Perma-cool
electric fans(1-14", 1-12"). Best 1/4 ET = 16.059@84.91

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Charles Wyman
>Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 1:03 PM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: DML How does Mopar cat back & headers compare to others
>
>
>Does anyone know how the Mopar cat back system compares to the
>others such as: Flowmaster, Gibson, Borla, etc...?
>
>Same with the headers, how do they compare?
>
>Chuck
>'00 Durango SLT+
>5.9L 4x4 3.92 LSD
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:59 EDT