Re: Dyno run for the 4.7L

From: Shari & Marty (msdng@netzero.net)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2000 - 20:30:36 EDT


Interesting enough, I know alot are different, but my R/T had 22% and the
5-speed of mine was at 8%. Interesting 5.2 & 5.9 cents, the 5.2 has a
Centerforce Dual friction setup which was at 18% before.
Kuk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Moseley" <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2000 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Dyno run for the 4.7L

> Tim J Koth wrote:
>
> > Shane, I think the numbers you posted for the 5.2 and 5.9 are
crankshaft or
> > flywheel dyno figures, not rear wheel dyno figures. Matts numbers were
rear
> > wheel figures for the 4.7 .......
> >
> >
>
> You know - I'm pretty sure you are right. So just add in...what 15
percent more
> for a manual and 20 percent for an auto?
>
> That would put the 4.7L somewhere in between the 5.2L and 5.9L possibly.
>
> Latr,
>
> Shane
>
> --
> '96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI/TB/Pulleys/Coil/Wires/CompTAs
> '96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck"
> '74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 home-brew EFI R&D vehicle
> '68 Black Corvette Convertible 427 (For Sale)
>
>
>

_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:39 EDT