I wish someone would do a Tony mod Dynojet run. To compare with Matt's
chart versus the QuickD chart.
----------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
Tel: (760) 725-2296
stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
mailto:Saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 1:18 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: QuickD Intake kit?
So I guess you're the one Tony was talking about. Something about Night and
Day difference. ;)
- Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: <Aajaynefour@cs.com>
Subject: Re: DML: QuickD Intake kit?
> Hey all.
>
> I was at Tony's about a week ago getting on of his intakes and modified
> throttle bodies fitted to my 4.7 5 speed. Wow! Quite a difference.
Really
> woke the engine up and I'm not even runnuing an after market exhaust
system
> ..... yet. Gonna go with a flowmaster 70 series dual out the rear I
believe,
> but that's another story.
>
> We tried all the combinations (OEM TB w/ K&N intake, modified TB w/ OEM
> intake and finally modified TB w/ K&N intake) and tested them on the
> "around-the-block-butt-dyno". Yes you could feel the difference
especially
> on the high end. The combination of the two yielded the best results.
The
> TB and the K&N intake definately compliment one another.
>
> The intake he sold me was the "short pipe" version that bolts directly to
the
> stock "air hat/resonator" once you remove the OEM air box and flex hose.
He
> is in the process of developing a "long pipe" version that will replace
the
> stock "air hat/resonator" as well. Aparently they are about equal in
> performance.
>
> I highly recomend the Quick-D. Tony has seen to it that this is a quality
> product without a lot of hype. It works.
>
> -Andrew
> aajaynefour@cs.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:40 EDT