RE: K&N dissed at inspection

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 23:35:51 EDT


I didn't think so...especially on MPI systems. No need for them.

Here's one last item to ponder on the validity of the Texas "Emissions
Check":

If they are failing vehicles because of "Tampered Emissions Controls" or
"Modified from Stock Configuration", why don't they fail the vehicles that
have dual exhaust coming out the back? The BAR-90 (and BAR-97) both clearly
state that the emissions controls only go as far as the cat...anything
beyond the catalytic converter is Non-Emissions related. So what makes
Texas so special on their "Non Factory Configuration"? Sorry people, not
even the Lonestar state can beat that one.

$0.02

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of The Man From Utopia
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 9:59 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: K&N dissed at inspection

> The '95 models still use a TAC??? (Thermostatic Air Cleaner)

I don't have one on my stock air can...

Greg
95 DSCC v6 5spd
Rahway NJ
http://24.6.89.18/mydodge.htm



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:40 EDT