I did the same thing to a 486 nec the other day update the bios then grab
yourself one of those handy win98 boot disks and get yourself some cd rom
support then copy the cab files to the harddrive including the other files in
the folder to something like a win98 folder, then run setup from the
harddrive. if you have another computer around with win 98 running just stick
the nec drive in it and do the copying from there then stick it back in the nec
and run setup.
The Man From Utopia wrote:
> >
> > sorry for using dml space for this but a resource is a
> > resource and i need help.
> >
> > the scenario: upgrading a 95 nec computer from windows 3.1
> > to windows 98
> >
> > the problem: it won't do it.
> > the solution?: i tried it in windows. i tried it in dos. i
> > formated drive c and tried in dos again. i tried with
> > a win 98 boot disk. win 98 disk keeps trying to install its drivers
> > for the cd rom onto the computer and they don't work but that's not
> stopping
> > it from wiping the functioning drivers from the machine.
> > the questions?:a friend mentioned defragging and formatting
> > drive c any value in that.
> > another suggested that perhaps the cd rom wasn't in a 32 bit format?
> > a web site mentioned a bios update was necessary(nec is out of
> > buisness though) what do i do now?
> > would this be way easier to do this in to stages win 3.1-95-98?
>
> Does this machine has a standard IDE CD-ROM or a SCSI CD-ROM? Open the
> machine and look at the data cable going to the CDR. If it has a 36 pin
> connector it is IDE, if it is a 50pin then it is SCSI. What exactly is
> happening??? Are you getting error messages when the drivers are loading or
> when you are trying to access the CDR or is it not reading the CD at all??
> Older CD-ROM drives have a problem reading multi-session CD's or CD's that
> were created either at speeds higher than 1x or in CD-XA format(BTW what
> speed is the CD-ROM drive???). NEC bought out Packard Bell years ago. Both
> NEC and PB computers sucked big time. It is possible that the CD drive has
> crapped out on you too.
>
> Greg
> 95 DSCC v6 5spd
> Rahway NJ
> ICQ: 283886
> http://24.6.89.18/dakota/dodge.htm
> DML Stickers at: http://24.6.89.18/dakota/dmlsticker.htm
The Man From Utopia wrote:
> >
> > sorry for using dml space for this but a resource is a
> > resource and i need help.
> >
> > the scenario: upgrading a 95 nec computer from windows 3.1
> > to windows 98
> >
> > the problem: it won't do it.
> > the solution?: i tried it in windows. i tried it in dos. i
> > formated drive c and tried in dos again. i tried with
> > a win 98 boot disk. win 98 disk keeps trying to install its drivers
> > for the cd rom onto the computer and they don't work but that's not
> stopping
> > it from wiping the functioning drivers from the machine.
> > the questions?:a friend mentioned defragging and formatting
> > drive c any value in that.
> > another suggested that perhaps the cd rom wasn't in a 32 bit format?
> > a web site mentioned a bios update was necessary(nec is out of
> > buisness though) what do i do now?
> > would this be way easier to do this in to stages win 3.1-95-98?
>
> Does this machine has a standard IDE CD-ROM or a SCSI CD-ROM? Open the
> machine and look at the data cable going to the CDR. If it has a 36 pin
> connector it is IDE, if it is a 50pin then it is SCSI. What exactly is
> happening??? Are you getting error messages when the drivers are loading or
> when you are trying to access the CDR or is it not reading the CD at all??
> Older CD-ROM drives have a problem reading multi-session CD's or CD's that
> were created either at speeds higher than 1x or in CD-XA format(BTW what
> speed is the CD-ROM drive???). NEC bought out Packard Bell years ago. Both
> NEC and PB computers sucked big time. It is possible that the CD drive has
> crapped out on you too.
>
> Greg
> 95 DSCC v6 5spd
> Rahway NJ
> ICQ: 283886
> http://24.6.89.18/dakota/dodge.htm
> DML Stickers at: http://24.6.89.18/dakota/dmlsticker.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:58 EDT