yep, you've got a good point, anything to stiffin the ass end up would help
in transferring the load a little quicker to the rear tires.
Matt
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<
-----Original Message-----
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven [mailto:STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 2:31 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE : Buying MY DURANGO....... RE: KUK
For more gripping on the rear, I would change the shocks for the dragster
version that Push the weight to the rear quickly versus the Mopar version.
I think even Mopar has a version of these type of shocks.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Marty & Sharon [mailto:msdng@netzero.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 11:04 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE : Buying MY DURANGO....... RE: KUK
Good point, concerning your dyno output, would you be interested in a dual
friction clutch on your setup to get more to the ground?
Kuk
So that is about .20 sec. (about) so if ya
> subtract that off of his ET, you get 14.5's, pretty interesting, but also,
> he dynoed at 213 hp and 302 TQ!
> which was within 5 hp of my 4.7L and 17 ft.lbs more. even more interesting
> is, he runs about the same short time 1.96.
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:15 EDT