Chris Lambert <clam9892@postoffice.uri.edu> wrote:
>And again you are saying that the 5.9 is faster than the 4.7. Do we have
>proof of this? I would not say who is quicker without numbers. It seems
>that the 4.7 and 5.9 are near equal powerplants. The 5.9 makes more torque
>than the 4.7 but the 4.7 has a higher redline (correct?)... so which is
>qucker..? Lets just say they are both great engines and are near equal.
The 4.7 is quicker, I was wrong. I stand corrected. I'm not looking
forward to Matt's excessive gloating, but he earned it, as he was
right.
Terry Herrin
99 FR CC R/T
14.769 @ 91.43
Wilmington, NC
http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:16 EDT