Brian,
Install a set of heavy-wall (like .080) pushrods, and stronger valve
springs. You could get by with this, but while you are at it you could
install a set of roller rockers also, which will help cut down on friction
and wear.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: McDaniel, Brian (Getronics) [mailto:McDaniB@bp.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 2:57 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
since you mentioned top end vs. low end... how to I go about getting a
little more top end???
> ----------
> From: Wisotzkey, Rich[SMTP:Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-wts.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 1:03 PM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: RE: DML: RE: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
>
> I think the Mopar's have better low end, and the JBA's have better top
> end.
> Not totally certain though. My selection of the JBA's was simple. I
> wanted
> a quality header I could bolt on in the garage, that didn't require
> cutting/welding, and preserve the ability to return the truck to stock
> without additional expense. I am completely satisfied with the JBA
> headers,
> but the y-pipe was another story. :'B
> Rich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDaniel, Brian (Getronics) [mailto:McDaniB@bp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 12:28 PM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: RE: DML: RE: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
>
>
> I agree... If I had the choice again, I would go with Mopar or Edelbrock.
> I
> have heard that the performance numbers are better on the others too!!
> Any
> thoughts on that??
>
> Brian
>
> > ----------
> > From: Wisotzkey, Rich[SMTP:Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-wts.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 11:16 AM
> > To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> > Subject: RE: DML: RE: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
> >
> > Sam,
> > I didn't plan on a y-pipe in the beginning. Actually, when I bought my
> > headers, JBA didn't have a y-pipe. I had trouble with the ceramic
> coating
> > on my headers. They have been recoated twice so far. Since I did have
> > this
> > trouble, JBA offered me the y-pipe if I was interested at cost to make
> up
> > for the coating trouble. The coating problems were not JBA's. It was
> the
> > company that performed the coating.
> >
> > You know how it works, "Hind sight is always 20/20." :'B If I'd only
> > known
> > where the road was going...
> > Rich
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sam Parthemer [mailto:rtdkota@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 11:36 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: RE: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
> >
> >
> > But if you ran Mopar Headers, they have a complete setup
> > w/Y pipe, even for the NV3500 manual trans. I should know,
> > I had a set on my '95 w/NV3500!
> >
> > Sam '00 RT
> >
> > --- "Wisotzkey, Rich" <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-wts.com> wrote:
> > > Fermin,
> > > If you're running a manual tranny, forget about the
> > > y-pipe. IT WON'T FIT
> > > !!! Not without cutting and welding. I've been there;
> > > trust me, it isn't
> > > worth it.
> > > Rich - Ashburn, VA
> > > '96 318 CC 5-speed w/modified JBA y-pipe
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fermin Lizalde Jr. [mailto:roachmotel69@home.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 5:29 PM
> > > To: Dakota Mail List
> > > Subject: DML: Stock Y-pipe Vs. JBA Y-pipe
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone know if there is a greater benefit from
> > > having the Y-pipe from
> > > JBA over the stock one? I'm ordering their headers and
> > > was wondering if
> > > their Y-pipe is worth the $154.99 (U.S.). According to
> > > www.truckperformance.com the pipes are 2" in diameter.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Fermin Lizalde Jr.
> > > roachmotel69@home.com
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Sam '00 RT
> > (14.667@93 mph)
> >
> > Get Paid to surf the Net!
> > http://www.alladvantage.com/ref_center.asp?refid=GTS444
> > Pay Anyone with a Credit Card. Checkout Paypals!
> > https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=srp%40home.com
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://im.yahoo.com/
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:17 EDT