RE: Re: Going back to 195 stat

From: brian.duffey@intelsat.int
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 14:43:26 EDT


" << thought you were going to replace the 24# injectors first?
>> "
Yeah Ted... in the interest of scientific method, why not change one element
at a time?
Could be that with the engine running hotter it'll be able to make better
use of the extra fuel from the 24# injectors.

Just another opinion for the internet.

Duff

-----Original Message-----
From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com [mailto:TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 2:27 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Going back to 195 stat

In a message dated 5/15/2000 11:21:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
bernd@texas.net writes:

<< thought you were going to replace the 24# injectors first?
>>

Both at the same time,I know its just not the injectors,,,

                        Ted O.
    99 SLT + 4X4, 318 ci, Powerdyne SC'er, Leach headers, Gibson stainless
catback, TransGo shift kit, R&D TB, K&N, Taylor wires, Autolite 3923's,
4.10's front and rear, Hoosier Drag slicks, Msd Boost retard ignition, Auto
meter Boost gauge, Beer cooler...1.7 roller rockers...24# injectors...M1
intake manifold, Soon electric fans, then Nitrous...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:18 EDT