Don't get me wrong, these BFG's are great! The goodyears I had were
255-60/15 Eagle RH's. BFG's are the same size. Wet traction of the
eagles (when they were new) was a bit better than the BFG's but not by
much. It's the cornering where these BFG's feel mucho better.
--Mike www.mikesdakota.com
Saturday, May 20, 2000, 11:59:49 AM, you wrote:
> Wow, that's a real surprise, Mike! I thought that BFG stood for Big
> F*&%ing Grip. Everyone complains about the stock Goodyears (especially
> the wonderful In-slick-tas). Are the BFGs any good in the rain? I know
> you get lots of chances to find out about that around Houston. Thanks for
> the info; I was seriously considering these tires, but won't get them if
> they don't have any more traction to offer than what little I now have.
> Richard in San Antonio
> On Sat, 20 May 2000 13:25:34 -0700 Michael Clark <magnumv8@wtez.net>
> writes:
>> Speaking of stability in the corners, I just put 4 new BFG Radial
>> T/A's on my Dak to replace the old Goodyears. These tires corner
>> much
>> better than the gy's ever did. I think the sidewall is more
>> reinforced to prevent the tire from rolling over too much. I can't
>> say they have better traction than the gy's, about the same....
>>
>> --Mike www.mikesdakota.com
>>
>>
> ________________________________________________________________
> YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:21 EDT