Makes sense to me. It has occurred to me before that
many calibrations of many things, if set dead on, will drift out of
acceptable range quicker than if you biased in the opposite
sense that natural wear takes things. In other words; what
you said.
Thanks,
Marty
Hemikota@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 5/20/00 11:37:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> mgalyean@acm.org writes:
>
> << Thanks for the info. I will likely give this a shot and see what I get.
> Are you running standard gap on those?
> >>
> actually, I gapped them alittle under .040 , i'd say about 37-38 thousandths,
> that way they have room to wear.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:21 EDT