RE: Synthetic Conversion (Bernd)

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 09:32:46 EDT


The fluids are supposed to be "slippery" than conventional Dino-Oil but from
past experiences on other vehicles with a "Synthetic Conversion", the MPG
didn't really go up at all. I'm running this for a personal test to see if
it actually does what they claim. Better MPG.

If you change your oil every 3500 miles (or even every 5000) with a good
quality brand, converting over to Synthetic is just a waste of money IMHO.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Todd Abernathy
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 1:42 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Synthetic Conversion (Bernd)

"I switched out the Power Steering Fluid, Clutch & Brake Fluid,
Differential
Fluid, Transmission Fluid, and Engine Oil...all to synthetic.
Let's see how the MPG reacts now."
Please clarify my understanding here. I thought synthetics just wore
(lasted longer) better than "traditional fluids" (and some would say are
more efficient), do they offer less resistance than traditional fluids,
too ? Is it that synthetics offering less resistance thus might help MPG
or something else ? How much difference in resistance can there be in
liquids ? Thanks for the synthetic's lesson in advance.
Todd
'00, 4.7, 5spd, CC, 4X4, Sport
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:21 EDT