The difference in minimal considering the performance gain... roughly a $2
per fillup difference for me.. very well worth it to me
> But won't the performance computer require higher-grade gas? Might be
> cheaper right now to get the performance computer, but if gas prices
> stay as high as they are...
>
> Dester223@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > More "food for thought" A stock computer for my 97 dakota costs 400
bucks.
> > He's correct by a performance computer being cheaper. I think some
members
> > are paying lower 300 bucks for it?
> > -Dester
> >
> > << He said that he is surprised that it really is bad. He said he has
seen
> > many computers replaced but this is the first one that was really bad.
> > (been working on Mopar for about 30 years) Don't know yet what it will
> > cost to replace. He said he can beat any price I get. Will know
> > tomorrow. He is going to try to get a performance PCM (supposed to be
> > cheaper also).
> >
> > I want to thank the people that tried to help me out. Your messages
help
> > to reinforce my thoughts at the very least. Thanks.
> >
> > Dave G.
> > 94 Sport 3.9L 5spd
> > >>
>
> --
> -andy
>
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Let's all get GNU'd together!
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:38 EDT