But won't the performance computer require higher-grade gas? Might be
cheaper right now to get the performance computer, but if gas prices
stay as high as they are...
Dester223@aol.com wrote:
>
> More "food for thought" A stock computer for my 97 dakota costs 400 bucks.
> He's correct by a performance computer being cheaper. I think some members
> are paying lower 300 bucks for it?
> -Dester
>
> << He said that he is surprised that it really is bad. He said he has seen
> many computers replaced but this is the first one that was really bad.
> (been working on Mopar for about 30 years) Don't know yet what it will
> cost to replace. He said he can beat any price I get. Will know
> tomorrow. He is going to try to get a performance PCM (supposed to be
> cheaper also).
>
> I want to thank the people that tried to help me out. Your messages help
> to reinforce my thoughts at the very least. Thanks.
>
> Dave G.
> 94 Sport 3.9L 5spd
> >>
-- -andyhttp://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com ----------------------------------------------------------- Let's all get GNU'd together! -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:38 EDT