Re: RE: Firestone or BFG?

From: Mark Pryer (mark_pryer@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 18:55:03 EDT


Greasy? like slick greasy or what? isn't this dangerous?
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 1:28 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Firestone or BFG?

> Do not get the BFG. I have them and after 15-30 minutes they get really
hot
> and greasy.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Pryer [mailto:mark_pryer@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:18 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Firestone or BFG?
>
> Ok everyone I need some opinions here, good or bad or both. I am looking
> into new tires and I have been told that I can fit 295s safely on the rear
> wheels, So I was calling around and I have been told that the firestone
> tires are better than the Bfg's in terms of wear and all around. They are
> 60,000 mile tires and supposedly wear evenly across the tread because of
the
> new Technology( uni-t) they developed for Nascar or whatever. What is the
> concensus opinion? sorry this is so long
> Mark
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:40 EDT