Re: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T

From: David Gloff (dgloff@xnet.com)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 11:42:51 EDT


The RX-7 isn't a 4, FYI. If anything, it's a 1, but you can't really
classify rotaries that way because they function so much differently than
conventional ICEs At any rate, 280hp out of a 1.3L street engine, turbo
or no, is damn impressive.

David Gloff
Computer Technician
Valcom Professional Computer Center; Kemper/Scudder/Zurich Funds
aolim: dgloff
Loaded Intense Blue '99 Dakota Sport CC 318 5-speed 3.92SG
F&B Stage I TB, Keystone/Proglass Ram Air Hood, 14x3" K&N, Sir Michael's
Roll Pan, Custom monochrome paint

If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be the happiest people on earth

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Seth Hollander wrote:

> Is the neon turbo charged. Even then I have trouble
> seeing it spank a dak. Then again there's the mazda
> rx-7, that's pretty quick with a 4. Not that the neon
> is bad, I just can't imagine it. I'd like to see one
> in action. -Seth
> --- DEREK BROOKS <DEREK00@prodigy.net> wrote:
> > hey in the 80 s they sent the omni (GLH AND GLHS)
> > to take care of the v8
> > rear drive cars of the day it had a turbo four and
> > it did very well .
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT