Re: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 12:32:31 EDT


They're two or three rotor versions. (Race has 4-rotor)

- Bernd

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gloff" <dgloff@xnet.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T

> The RX-7 isn't a 4, FYI. If anything, it's a 1, but you can't really
> classify rotaries that way because they function so much differently than
> conventional ICEs At any rate, 280hp out of a 1.3L street engine, turbo
> or no, is damn impressive.
>
> David Gloff
> Computer Technician
> Valcom Professional Computer Center; Kemper/Scudder/Zurich Funds
> aolim: dgloff
> Loaded Intense Blue '99 Dakota Sport CC 318 5-speed 3.92SG
> F&B Stage I TB, Keystone/Proglass Ram Air Hood, 14x3" K&N, Sir Michael's
> Roll Pan, Custom monochrome paint
>
> If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be the happiest people on earth
>
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Seth Hollander wrote:
>
> > Is the neon turbo charged. Even then I have trouble
> > seeing it spank a dak. Then again there's the mazda
> > rx-7, that's pretty quick with a 4. Not that the neon
> > is bad, I just can't imagine it. I'd like to see one
> > in action. -Seth
> > --- DEREK BROOKS <DEREK00@prodigy.net> wrote:
> > > hey in the 80 s they sent the omni (GLH AND GLHS)
> > > to take care of the v8
> > > rear drive cars of the day it had a turbo four and
> > > it did very well .
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://im.yahoo.com/
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT