Re: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T

From: Doug Fedeli (rdf@eznet.net)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 13:21:12 EDT


The RX-7 is a rotary engine. cu.in. to cu.in. they are more efficient.
Much less reciprocating mass.

Doug Fedeli

Seth Hollander wrote:

> Is the neon turbo charged. Even then I have trouble
> seeing it spank a dak. Then again there's the mazda
> rx-7, that's pretty quick with a 4. Not that the neon
> is bad, I just can't imagine it. I'd like to see one
> in action. -Seth
> --- DEREK BROOKS <DEREK00@prodigy.net> wrote:
> > hey in the 80 s they sent the omni (GLH AND GLHS)
> > to take care of the v8
> > rear drive cars of the day it had a turbo four and
> > it did very well .
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT