Oops, I meant 353 HP.
LOL< 454 would be nice though. :)
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Stewart" <firebird@kymtnnet.org>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T
> It's suppose to be the 454HP/tq 5.7 Hemi in the new Charger. The CHarger
is
> suppose to be competition for Mustang/Cambirds. The leave the Viper to
> handle the Vette.
>
> -Ryan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stlaurent Mr Steven" <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:58 PM
> Subject: RE: DML: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T
>
>
> > Same as the new Charger R/T is suppose to do. The likes of the Vette,
> > Camaro/Trans Am, and the Rustang. But with the 327HP 4.7, Hmm! I
really
> > don't now. Since the new Cobra is going to the 385HP, the upcoming
Vette
> is
> > aspiring to 400plus HP, and the Camaro will receive the LT1 from the C5
> > version. Where does that leave the Charger???
> >
> > I still love the Cuda deign around 70 & 71 era. Now imaged that with the
> > 440??? SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
> > Test Engineer
> > Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> > MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> > 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> > Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> > Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DAK4JLB@aol.com [mailto:DAK4JLB@aol.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:35 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T
> >
> > Well you can make anything fast. Damn impressive times and dyno.
> > Did you know that the Mustang was originally designed to take the
> Corvette,
> > damn they really missed on that. Also, the Rustang was not the first
pony
> > car. The Plymouth Barracuda came out just about 2 weeks before. Go Go
> Mighty
> >
> > Mo. The Mustang got the title of the first pony car because of the
sales.
> >
> > Zeus
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT