Well, thank you very much for the effort. If you've definitely got something
to back that figure up, that's awesome. That's nearly 70hp/liter!
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:55 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: 4.7 Hemi
> There was an interview with the chief of design Tom Gale and Autoweek
> (couple months back). Hmm! If not I will find the article for you Sean.
> Must be old age.....
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Bruckman [mailto:bruckman@urisp.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 11:25 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: 4.7 Hemi
>
> Where exactly did you get the figure of 327 hp for the HO 4.7L? I have
not
> heard of any concrete information on the engine... The CNG version in the
> charger concept put out 325 horse and the Jeepster concept had a gas HO
4.7
> with 275 hp. I expect an HO version to have the same 1 hp/cube ratio as
the
> 5.7 hemi. Although the designs are not really the same (4.7 designed much
> more economically than the 5.7 because the 5.7 can save gas by shutting
down
> half of the cylinders when under light load), it's likely the engineering
> goal. Or perhaps the similar rated 275 hp jeepster HO will be it... 275,
> 287, 325, 327... i'm gonna be happy no matter what. I'd like to know your
> source though...Mainly because i pride myself on keeping up on the new
> engines and vehicles and i've never heard of actual output numbers for the
> HO 4.7.
>
> Sean
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 11:49 AM
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: 4.7 Hemi
>
>
> > Do you choose a 5.7 (353HP) or the 4.7 (327HP)? That is a question my
> dear
> > WATSON...2003. The RAM truck will be release next September. Oh! I
have
> a
> > drawing of it and not much of a drastic change. Then the following year
> the
> > Dakota will be on the market. No pictures yet unless someone knows
anyone
> > at the design studio in Detroit.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
> > Test Engineer
> > Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> > MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> > 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> > Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> > Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:45 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Re: RE: 4.7 Hemi
> >
> > Yep, HemiKota is what a lot of people who are buying them are calling
> them.
> > They are nearly as fast as R/Ts with 5 speeds, but MUCH better on gas
> > mileage. Not a big aftermarket yet, but I think there will be in a year.
> > The new R/T (2002) is suppose to either have the new 5.7 Hemi, or a HO
> > version of the 4.7 Hemi.
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ScapeGoat" <martyr@adelphia.net>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 11:23 AM
> > Subject: DML: RE: 4.7 Hemi
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, does that mean I have a "Hemi Kota"?
> > >
> > >
> > > '00 Sport Plus CC 4.7L V8 4x4
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT