Now I can see what a SRT Neon will do when it hits the street for 2001.
Scary! I will have to apply the same in the Dak.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Berry [mailto:coolva1@home.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:04 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Neon R/T vs Dakota R/T
Its alot easier to propel a 2500LB? neon than it is a 4300 LB dakota....
its all to do with Physics... before I had a supercharger on my truck, My
bro in law could keep up with me in his 95 Neon 5 speed (SOHC)
They are fast little cars... I guess thats why they are everywhere =-)
Tim Berry
Chesapeake, VA
> Is the neon turbo charged. Even then I have trouble
> seeing it spank a dak. Then again there's the mazda
> rx-7, that's pretty quick with a 4. Not that the neon
> is bad, I just can't imagine it. I'd like to see one
> in action. -Seth
> --- DEREK BROOKS <DEREK00@prodigy.net> wrote:
> > hey in the 80 s they sent the omni (GLH AND GLHS)
> > to take care of the v8
> > rear drive cars of the day it had a turbo four and
> > it did very well .
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:33 EDT