I would hardly call 14 years lasting a month....I owned my prior Toyota for
5 years, put 50,000 miles on it (bought it with 90,000 on the odometer), and
beat the hell out of that truck. Now tell me, why am I having all these
problems on a truck that I baby? As far as the new Toyotas, I will do a bit
more research, but from all the info that I can find in print and on the
web, the Dakota series of trucks have a much higher failure rate than the
Toyotas..........real world experience says it all in my eyes. I know 3 ppl
personally that have Daks, and all of them have had problems that I would
put in the major category. I know many many ppl with 93 and newer Toyotas,
and not one major problem. As far as what Steve says, I am going to research
the info and DEFINETLY take that into consideration. But I feel that I would
be stupid to give DC one more dime of my money. Even Ford is looking good to
me now.
on 7/9/00 8:37 AM, MrDakota95@aol.com at MrDakota95@aol.com wrote:
> Maybe (Toy's) is the right name for them after all because any one with kids
> knows you pay through the nose for some popular piece of sh%t and it lasts a
> month. LOL
>
> Shawn
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:34 EDT