I think with the K&N and AIR/FUEL SENSOR, it is a matter of volume of air.
I ensure now that the 14x? is equal to the K&N cone 9x?. This means the
same mass of air volume will remain the same. The difference is the open
air restriction when using the 14" flat filter and air turbulence. I have
the computation at home.
I think Matt has the 14" K&N and claims it is much better than the paper
element.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: dakman@freewwweb.com [mailto:dakman@freewwweb.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 9:15 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: K&N ???
With my 8" K&N Filter my 5.2 Auto, 355s, ran consistant 15.0s, with a
best of 14.97. The truck always had a flat spot for 2 to 3 carlenghts
out of the hole. I since have changed to a 14" paper filter. WOW!!! It
now runs consistant 14.8s. The flat spot is gone. The 60 ft times
dropped from high 2.2s to low 2.1s. The bottom end feels great. Maybe a
14" K&N????????? D
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:34 EDT