I know it doesn't pull as much as the eRam. I was just curious as to what it
was really like after reading it's review on the Saturn performance website.
Hear me now, believe me later....I'm absolutely sold on the eRam. I really
don't want to mess with NOS, and a full size supercharger is just more than
I want to do to my engine at this point. I'm just going to have to spend an
extra half hour a day collecting bottles and cans on the side of the road
;-) until I get the $ to buy one. I'm just being curious about other
products, that's all. Besides, I'm still planning on heading down to College
Station in late August or early Sept to see my kids, and I want to see one
(eRam) for real before I buy one. Hopefully it would be ok for me to stop
and look at it shortly, wouldn't want to intrude.
-Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [SMTP:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 11:25 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: Turbozet Attn:Dester
>
> It doesn't even pull half as much as the eRam. I was able to get a brief
> email from the "TurboZet" folks and it's just not worth it. If they can
> prove that it will pull up to 750CFM at 3lbs of thrust...which for that
> little fan is impossible, well...I'll give you my eRam.
>
> - Bernd
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greig, Doug" <douggr@hazelett.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:53 AM
> Subject: DML: Turbozet Attn:Dester
>
>
> > Dester, was that you on EBAY bidding on that Turbozet? If it was, I was
> > hoping you would get it and let us know what it's like. I just jacked up
> the
> > bid amount a little for the guy that beat you out so far. I wish I could
> get
> > my hands on one of these, or even better, an E-Ram.
> >
> > Doug Greig
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:35 EDT