i guess that sums it up..however,anybody with a scanner and a little time
could manufacture that article..hahahah..good investigating
>From: Jack Hilton <hemi@charter.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: R/T - Who Cares???
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:28:08 -0400
>
>Here is the proof directly from DC that I stated earlier. If you think
>there is
>still a shadow of a doubt, then you are beyond help.
>
>http://www.dakotart.com/images/rtproof.jpg
>
>
>
>James Marchetti wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I have never seen such hubbub about something so irrelevant!
> >
> > For all I know R/T could mean;
> > Radical Truck
> > Really Trick
> > Righteously Tuned
> > Ripped and Torn...
> >
> > So, with that in mind, I would love to see us all drop the whole thread
> > about what it means until someone can show, beyond a shadow of a doubt,
>that
> > the R/T means ANYTHING at all.
> >
> > I challenge all those who are so bent about this to do some real
>research
> > (pronounced - get a hold of Chrysler's historical people) and find the
>true
> > answer on this most annoying issue.
> >
> > BTW, I do not have an R/T and after all this hoopla about it, will
>surely
> > never have one. I am afraid I would get sucked into this silliness.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Jim
> >
> > PS -- the thanks in advance is for all those who respond without
>flaming
> > and have the answer.
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:40 EDT
