Any Holley is rather easy to maintain...the only problems you may run into
is the fact that they have a "average" calibration and not specific to your
engine. Some tuning will be required. (Summit Racing sells a very good
Accelerator Pump Cam that has worked on several different engines in the
past...including Mopar.)
- Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Pryer" <mark_pryer@hotmail.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: Re: Scott Miller
> That sounds cool except for the price. A little to pricey for me, What
> about a straight 750 cfm carb? are they easy to maintain? Are they better
> power wise vs. the CPU? and Hey Scott since you changed to carbed were
your
> gauges mechanical before or did you change them?
> Mark
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 9:10 PM
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Scott Miller
>
>
> > The Holley Projection System is a fully adjustable TBI system. (Bolts
> right
> > up to any square-bore manifold). I used to run one of the original
900CFM
> > units on my old Camaro and the power went up about 12HP and the mileage
> also
> > went up about 2mpg. It's easy to tune from the driver seat and even
> easier
> > now since you can calculate the fuel curves on your computer, transfer
the
> > curve to a floppy and then upload it into the Projection system. Once
> this
> > is done and you've run a few test laps, you can download from the floppy
> > back into your computer and adjust where it's necessary. (It's that
easy)
> >
> > Total cost: $1300 (average with O2 sensor)
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Mark Pryer
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 1:04 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: Re: Scott Miller
> >
> >
> > Does it have more power potential or what? I also wanna try and keep it
> > above 8 mpg. hehe I don't really know much about carbed stuff so why is
> it
> > better?
> > Mark
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:23 PM
> > Subject: DML: RE: Re: Re: Scott Miller
> >
> >
> > > Hands down...the 360 with a carb. (But the Holley Projection system
> work
> > > MUCH better.)
> > >
> > > - Bernd
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Mark Pryer
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 12:18 AM
> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > Subject: DML: Re: Re: Scott Miller
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok yeah would you recommend the carb or cpu? I am saving to swap my 6
> for
> > a
> > > 360 and am stuck and don't know what to choose. which has more HP
> > > potential?
> > > Mark
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Scott Miller <fastdak@superpa.net>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 1:54 PM
> > > Subject: DML: Re: Scott Miller
> > >
> > >
> > > > I put a holley 750 on mine. I personally didn't want to be limited
by
> > the
> > > > computer. If I wanna change cams, I can and not have to worry about
> the
> > > > computer flipping out. Yeah, I know I could have got one
reprogramed,
> > but
> > > I
> > > > figured I'd save the 500 dollars and just eliminate the computer all
> > > > together. I also do a lot of bracket racing, and the carb. is a lot
> > more
> > > > consistent for this game
> > > >
> > > > any other ?'s let me know
> > > >
> > > > Scott Miller
> > > > 89 Shelby Dakota #322 - 360 C.I. V8 (12.56 @ 110 mph) "FASTDAK"
> > > > 94 Dakota Sport - 3.9 V6 5-Speed (15.86 @ 84 mph)
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Mark Pryer <mark_pryer@hotmail.com>
> > > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:41 PM
> > > > Subject: DML: Scott Miller
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Scott is your 360 carbed or EFI? Why did you pick what you
got?
> > > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:48 EDT