I think of it as a Gen 1.5 because it is kinda in between. But for general
purpose I regard it as a gen 2 since they share many common traits with only
cosmetic differences (and the engine of course).
Mark
91 cc 5spd 6er Dynomax catback 14x3 K&N Ported TB
Bucket seats Accel Super Stock coil, Lund Roll pan.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon <jon@twistedbits.net>
To: Dakota Mailing List <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 3:19 PM
Subject: DML: Gen I, II, III consensus
>
> I've been meaning to post about this, but haven't gotten around to
> it yet. With the recent Gen I, II talk, I was reminded of it.
>
> I was wondering if we could possibly come to a consensus regarding
> Gen I and Gen II. Since we're the ones who originated the term, I
> don't see why we can't define it further. :-)
>
> Anyway, Gen III is pretty clear cut. They start in '97 due to the
> bodystyle change.
>
>
> The problem is Gen I vs Gen II. I don't think there is any doubt
> that '87-90 Daks are definitely Gen I, and '92-96 are Gen II.
>
> The problem year is '91. In that year, Daks had a pre-mag engine,
> but with the updated (Gen II style) bodywork.
>
> The question is, do we call a '91 Gen I or Gen II?
>
> Personally, I'm leaning toward Gen II. The reason is, the
> designation appears to be directed more towards bodystyle than
> engine. The Gen IIIs have basically the same drivetrain, but a
> different bodystyle. Therefore, I think we should call a '91 a
> Gen II, based on the bodystyle.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Jon-
>
> .---- Jon Steiger ----- jon@dakota-truck.net or
jon@twistedbits.net ------.
> | Affiliations: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA; Rec & UL Pilot -
SEL |
> | '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly 447
|
> `------------------------------
http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ----'
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:22 EDT