Gen I, II, III consensus

From: Tim J Koth (Tim.J.Koth@aexp.com)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 22:39:34 EDT

I'd have to side with Jon on this one....

  Personally, I'm leaning toward Gen II. The reason is, the
designation appears to be directed more towards bodystyle than
engine. The Gen IIIs have basically the same drivetrain, but a
different bodystyle. Therefore, I think we should call a '91 a
Gen II, based on the bodystyle.

 Thoughts?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:22 EDT